High volume, low variance logs where cost outweighs value
Medium riskLogs that repeat at high volume during incidents or spikes. Error floods during an outage. Retry storms when a dependency fails. The same message, thousands of times, telling you one thing: something is broken.
A downstream service goes down. Every request to it fails. Every failure logs an error. You get 100,000 “Connection timeout” errors in an hour. They’re all real errors. But they’re all symptoms of one problem.The logging is correct. The volume is the issue.
Unlike hot path logs, these aren’t code mistakes. The logging is correct. You just don’t need every instance. Sampling at the edge reduces volume while preserving signal.
Tero identifies excessive repetition by analyzing volume spikes and content variance in your context graph. A log event that suddenly spikes 100x with identical content is flagged.The key is distinguishing repetition from legitimate high volume. 100,000 different users hitting an endpoint is high volume. 100,000 identical timeout errors is repetition. Tero looks at content variance to tell the difference.